Friday, April 20, 2012

Social Media, Copyright, and All That Jazz


            I think the most important takeaway from this semester is slacktivism and activism via social media. This is an important issue because there are the naysayers, like Gladwell, that say doing something online is like doing nothing at all. He says we cannot accomplish anything by acting online since we do not have close ties to the problems we are trying to solve, and that anyone can post on their Facebook or Twitter about an issue but won’t actually take things any steps further. He even debunks the credit given to Twitter and Facebook for contributing to recent revolutions, like in Egypt. From what I’ve learned, I know this is not true and Twitter and Facebook can have an impact on real issues. Even if all someone does is post a picture or status about an issue, someone else could learn about it from that person and go out and participate in real life activism.
            Another takeaway I think is important is the way businesses use social media and their invisible audiences. Especially with social media being an important part of businesses these days, it is important to be doing it the right way. After exploring businesses on Twitter it’s interesting to see that some businesses’ feeds overwhelmingly comprised of complaints visitors have about their business, so it appears there are a lot of negative issues with the business. There are also businesses on the other end of the spectrum that seem to completely ignore negative things their customers have to say. We’ve learned that it’s important to find a balance of giving feedback to customers as well as posting things about their businesses on their own. They must also consider their audiences, and not aim too narrowly at one audience, but cannot be to broad, either. As someone who just got an internship in social media and marketing, I’m really happy to have learned about businesses using social media sites effectively.
            Another aspect of social media that we took a look at that I think is important is privacy issues. I knew that Facebook had some access to my information and shared it with advertisers, but I didn’t know Facebook and other social media sites sold my information to businesses. I think it’s important for people to know that they are automatically opted-in to letting Facebook share their information, and they should know how to opt-out. I was appalled to find out that you cannot really opt out of Google’s privacy settings, and that they share information so widely. We discussed in class that privacy is a commodity to these companies since we use their sites, but I must disagree. As I’ve said before, our information should not be considered a trade-off for using social media sites, since users add value to these sites, especially to sites like Google. Our participating on each site and raising its value should be payment enough; our privacy should not be compromised.
            Another important takeaway is the question of what works copyright should be used in. Miller wrote about music sampling, and made the point that we rarely come up with something completely original in any piece of work, but we draw from inspiration from others to create our work. I definitely agree with Miller on this one, we draw all our ideas from something else in life and make them into something that’s more our own. Unfortunately, copyright laws have immensely limited what we can and cannot borrow from others. Sampling music, for example, is extremely difficult since now DJs must go through long processes to get permission to use even a small piece of music that even resembles another song. This seems somewhat absurd to me, since it seems that there are only so many ways to arrange musical notes to sound a certain way, and with all the music out their I’m sure many people unintentionally sample others’ music without knowing they did. I think copyright and sharing laws are important to a degree but I think amateurs should not get in any trouble for sampling or borrowing the work of someone else as long as credit is given. Copyright is important, but I think it is taken too far sometimes.

Thursday, April 5, 2012

Busta Rhymes & a 1981 PSA Announcement

I've traced Busta Rhymes' "Dangerous" to find out which songs he's sampled. I remember when I was younger watching his videos thinking they were pretty weird but awesome at the same time. Seeing where he traced some of his songs from just makes me think he's more unique and extremely creative.
The first song Busta traced in "Dangerous" is one in a 1981 PSA from Long Island Poison Control about prescription meds. It's a cheesy commercial where puppet pills are singing about how dangerous they are. Busta uses their song as his chorus:
"This is serious
We could make you delirious
You should have a healthy fear of us
'Cause too much of us is dangerous"
I definitely think Busta Rhymes is creative in using this as his chorus, it's even pretty funny to find out and listen to. His use of the chorus is talking about he and his friends being dangerous, almost like a drug. It's just so funny that it came from a PSA. He was 9 years old when the commercial came out and did live in New York, so maybe he saw the commercial and remembered it for the 16 years before "Dangerous" came out. A cheesy PSA announcement is the last place I would expect a rapper to get inspiration from.
In "Dangerous" Busta Rhymes uses a slightly altered version of Extra T's "E.T. Boogie", which came out in 1982, for his beats. The original song is a dance song, but the way Busta alters and uses it has turned it into a quirky hip hop beat that seems like it would be original to Busta. I think it was creative to use the beat from this song, since he used it for a different genre and turned it into something that sounds unique to him.
I'm not sure whether I would consider either sample stealing, especially considering when Miller says, "And I'm attracted to writing's infectiousness, the way you pick up language from other writers and make it as your own." I think he was influenced by both "E.T. Boogie" and the PSA, but made them his own. The wording was the same as in the PSA, but used in a totally different way and for a totally different purpose. The PSA had a purpose of educating, where Busta had a purpose of self-expression and entertainment.
When sampling "E.T. Boogie" I think Busta recreated the beats and made them his own. I think he was more inspired than outright taking some else's work. It's like what Keller said in her article, "New art builds on old art. We hear music, process it, reconfigure it, and create something derivative but new." Though "Dangerous" is very close to the Extra T's song, it is not identical and has been changed to create Busta's song. This makes me think of apparel, where one designer can change another designer's clothes slightly, then sell them as their own.
I really thing "Dangerous" is a great song and Busta Rhymes was creative in making. I do wonder, since he was so young when the samples he used came out, if he was inspired back then. That would be awesome and impressive.